Received: from mail.netlandish.com (unknown [10.138.202.29])
	by code.netlandish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA29815C2;
	Tue,  3 Nov 2020 15:07:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.218.68; helo=mail-ej1-f68.google.com; envelope-from=keijser@gmail.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN> 
Authentication-Results: mail.netlandish.com;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=cN2XYDcJ
Received: from mail-ej1-f68.google.com (mail-ej1-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68])
	by mail.netlandish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8E884945;
	Tue,  3 Nov 2020 07:07:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-f68.google.com with SMTP id gn41so7274386ejc.4;
        Tue, 03 Nov 2020 07:07:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to;
        bh=J9vv+a9aS1WKBgmbifxLMf6ddseg4UR/QwhdUlcO04E=;
        b=cN2XYDcJhtk3d8N+QHz/5gZT+8yRo/bvy3FnTvH6R6u8KgkIhi7nPSI87ZRPmdnt+L
         0ydbxocIQ5IsCJNVAB1aNgtCsqweBzwxxVOZIR0u+6+kXlphsDUkjP0t3kWuUxVeX7Ca
         QIYEFGkHFkBOLb895natq9DtlIq6Lm/IL3zsc1U7edol6KI+3x9fOF1RefhXT7U7AH9f
         osGQTOUO3KKt13oyiKACa9VEFhXvebLDYKA0Eayqi1mPqlQ7GUEe5SE9+X7ItrVUrSf1
         Igf0sOA5cL2yZrr3M7EAIPb9tuvCQx1ZwLdhCFaOJQ8xNSOmHb9zHr7wuP6cVTbDKpR9
         Xkjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
        bh=J9vv+a9aS1WKBgmbifxLMf6ddseg4UR/QwhdUlcO04E=;
        b=WRrc2OpGM5KHOQxYqXwxIArdF81dquULaKp3Cfbg6waaw7e3ohueOh2lSQZ7NrBDzj
         9k40QTDVYE5AR8VrA+XZl3DsSDjQO+KltVSwWd6D+PqXG/4OSkrCHtvISkm5sHtl5zmV
         uVmPtVvrZfQ7IfW2tepVv/gyumSHjO/+Y8kb6xvA214wnC1CdEugkBepnAIP3EnYBwD3
         SrnEMEG0nVQ1hQev7743fyMj1IBgl+QCN9i/ADOMaDd6k3255DcugbCaslCTjTsmqSjQ
         tVdNSwzw4ClEnxiABZthZEQge219LzqnZ7bD9cCz5M+D3Ycb5kOxVGUj80RVyB89nVQr
         18Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531V2A7NwyNUSh8xou+JmwHx3sn57M6iNAKC6NnvlAeVRZiX4sJk
	yDtIFdP3IGBEkf3PvxnjS90=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytrCLl6ucXhmSA44hEpY58qRDU7VhEXCI/uZ4n72NvfgcXODLHw6LQwyQCoLRVct9Jk0Pv3Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6987:: with SMTP id i7mr10560138ejr.18.1604416056778;
        Tue, 03 Nov 2020 07:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([91.141.170.147])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bx24sm11193245ejb.51.2020.11.03.07.07.35
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Tue, 03 Nov 2020 07:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:07:34 +0100
From: David Keijser <keijser@gmail.com>
To: Peter Sanchez <peter@netlandish.com>
Cc: ~netlandish/email-test-drive@lists.code.netlandish.com,
	~petersanchez/public-inbox@lists.code.netlandish.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2 py-scfg] Return None when trying to get missing
 sub-directive
Message-ID: <20201103150734.cp5jvkmzk4j5that@splurge>
References: <33f5a3354dc7b1fce863.1604249472@splurge.local>
 <20201101234401.bok7i4wvl4heda6r@thinkpad>
 <20201102102207.ll2jsexcincf6apz@splurge>
 <20201102181119.5db37dggeaqpelld@thinkpad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pnpccjg745w7p746"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201102181119.5db37dggeaqpelld@thinkpad>


--pnpccjg745w7p746
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:11:19AM -0800, Peter Sanchez wrote:
> On 11/02, David Keijser wrote:
> > Ok, cool. Did the other patch make it to you too?
> >=20
> > Having type annotations would be great when writing code using scfg
> > because it enables type checking with mypy and nice editor integration
> > with langserver and the like.
>=20
> Hrmm, no. I only got the 1 and checking the mail logs I don't see
> multiple emails being submitted yesterday from your email address. Can
> you please resend?

I tried to resend yesterday, this time to the public-inbox address, but
I'm not sure if it worked. My smtp client said ok at least.

--pnpccjg745w7p746
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE6wdzEJFyb+9A/HDQUhDpDV+A/IgFAl+hcjIACgkQUhDpDV+A
/IiBCQf/aMHe40cNM9OV5DsjEBtWNO7TMrofKgk01VTXe+IJW/mXn/na9GUWvl/u
SyvG1Am7YgRVNTthSuoBDa670AaicSvVrHDWDIWF6/kn8O6Y2GoVvmatz9Dz/0Td
uGqD4xKScU9C0zHDXTncMqJsB7Sn7N/Ew9by+tFB2yZstm0xBcPuj7Hy99HWCLfz
YIRO9g2tIHn4q1Vi5W/zAsaOmTTs0kVsC4c/gCrSEQ8g9AsaMEdJBF8DW6N1muSH
U4DqMjqtWa0FV+d8HNo4GfQ1+yNRTUtr4yT9+JmXNuy4azRAsH2amDpthErCTMeH
zFx2/3yg2uh8zurxqVONIBF1/eADQg==
=ycjR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pnpccjg745w7p746--